The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Glyman: AI human augmentation is currently more valuable than full automation
“People tend to jump right to full automation when really what is incredibly valuable in the short run is augmentation of people on, on aspects of what they do.”
Glyman: Customers do not want to chat with their bank accounts
“We'd never met a single person who's like, I just wish I could chat with my bank account.”
Glyman: Expanding small product teams into 30-person consensus groups kills velocity
“I think one of the worst things you can do to people building products is go from, hey, it's you and four people trying to decide what a well-run product is, a great experience could look like, ah, to go do a good job, and you say, great, now get 30 other peop…”