The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 2 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Eifrem: Detecting normal-looking fraud rings requires graph databases
“What it won't capture is that what if you have a number of transactions that are all within this band of what's normal, but they're connected in fraudulent ways, like a fraud way. Like the only way you can find that is if you can operate and connect the data, …”
Eifrem: Successful category creation requires attracting major tech incumbents as competitors
“What does success look like? 10 years down the line, what does success look like? Well, success looks like we have a bunch of big companies that are competing against us. That's what success looks like, right? ... That, that you have a thriving category, becau…”