why aren't all 4 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
JPMorgan is avoiding blockchain and digital currency, unlike Goldman Sachs
“When you compare that, for instance, to JP Morgan, you don't, you see JP Morgan has sort of avoided the digital currency space, right? They're not doing anything in blockchain or Bitcoin you know, like Goldman is, right?”
Assertion Not checkable as stated
JPMorgan built a six-billion-row pivot table using Sigma Computing
“But the fun part is like a reference JP Morgan Who uses our product, and when they connected the first time, the guys, I think, is sort of like, I can swear in here. Holy , holy , I just built a six billion row pivot table, right?”
Assertion Partly supported
JPMorgan Chase and Citi each spend $2B to $4B annually on compliance
“The big ones, like JPMorgan Chase, Citi, et cetera, have 10,000 plus analysts working on this every year. They're spending two to four billion dollars a year on compliance.”
Assertion Supported
Historically 15% of IT companies suffer catastrophic value loss yearly
“You know, in any given year, about 15% of the companies in the IT world have a catastrophic loss of value, which is 70% of your value evaporates, and it never comes back. So for the last five years, that's been five percent.”