why aren't all 5 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
DeepMind's reinforcement learning fails on minor visual changes while Vicarious succeeds
“So if you use, ah, if you compare, ah, Vicarious, ah, system with, ah, DeepMind system, ah, for example, if you change the brightness of the screen DeepMind system will stop playing, ah, because it will, ah, get confused, ah, and if you offset the paddle we ou…”
Assertion Partly supported
DeepMind AI discovered unknown biological differences between male and female retinas
“DeepMind did a project with Moorfields, which is iHospital in the UK. And they were looking at retinas. And their system discovered a difference between male and female retinas, and apparently medical science didn't actually know there was a difference between…”
Assertion Supported
DeepMind reasoning models identified disease targets validated in wet labs
“And so DeepMind has shown that you can integrate this kind of reasoning model to sort of decipher new targets for disease, new mechanisms that were actually also proven in a wet lab scenario post facto.”
Assertion Supported
OpenAI and DeepMind achieved Math Olympiad gold medals
“And, you know, we saw gold medals on the International Math Olympiad by a couple of labs, including OpenAI and DeepMind.”
Assertion Supported
Marcus: DeepMind's deep RL required millions of data points per game
“This is what DeepMind used in their systems, and they used a version called deep reinforcement learning. And what they did is they collected billions or, you know, probably millions of data points for each game.”