The Ledger

Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.

1statements match

0resolved → 0open claims → 0supported → 0contradicted →

why aren't all 1 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable

Assertion Not checkable as stated

Kaganovich: Researchers distrust public genomic databases because submission standards vary wildly

“But no one trusts other people's submissions, we found, because the standards are different.”

Mark Kaganovich Feb 18, 2015 ▶ 12:23 Mark Kaganovich, SolveBio // Data Infrastructure For Genomics // Data Driven NYC (FirstMark Capital)

Turn any episode into a week of clips.

This entire site, over 400 conversations transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable, runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.

The Ledger

Turn any episode into a week of clips.