The Ledger
Every statement that passed quotation and attribution checks. Mix any filter with any other: certainty 1/5, debate potential 5/5, or both at once.
why aren't all 3 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't; assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card: ▮▮▮▮▮ certainty · ▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Tawakol: Enterprise AI demands significantly higher accuracy tolerances than consumer AI
“If you tell Alexa to play a song and she plays the wrong one, no problem. You tell Eva to update Salesforce and automatically update Salesforce record, and it's the wrong record, there's a problem.”
Evans: Siri and Alexa were decision trees despite natural language capabilities
“There was like a trap with Siri and Alexa, which was that natural language processing worked, so you thought it was AI, and it wasn't. It was actually still just an IVR, it was still just a tree.”
Pesenti: Alexa and Google Home rely on limited, scripted dialogues
“When you interact with something like Alexa or Google Home today, right, this system basically do intent recognition and then they have a very scripted dialogue after this, right? So usually You recognize one of the steps, and it's very limited because you can…”