Dec 5, 2013 · 44m · mad
Panel discussion // Data Driven NYC #13 // Dec 2012
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
At Data Driven NYC #13, host Matt Turck moderates a panel featuring founders Oren Falkowitz (Sqrrl), Drew Bansal (InfoChimps), and Eric Frenkiel (MemSQL) discussing startup origins, database architectures, enterprise security, and the future of big data.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Matt holds 8.3% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Matt, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
An audience member forcefully asserts that no data scientists use SQL anymore and directly questions why anyone would choose MemSQL over MongoDB.
Hardest push from Matt ▶ 40:36 Matt cuts off off-topic questionMatt politely but firmly shuts down an unproductive and confusing audience query about satellite-free GPS, insisting it be taken offline.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 35:14 Eric details technical flaws of MongoDBEric educates the audience on MongoDB's performance limitations, specifically contrasting its global write lock and schema repetition with MemSQL's concurrent relational engine.
Matt holds his own ▶ 10:35 Matt challenges premise on open-source softwareWhen Drew suggests that difficult technical problems are open-sourced, Matt counters with domain knowledge by pointing out that databases are notoriously hard yet predominantly open-sourced.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Matt as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Matt pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panelist Origins and Company Evolution | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Matt opens the panel with lightweight origin questions about the founders' transitions into entrepreneurship. Oren playfully corrects Matt's narrative about VCs forcing Sqrrl to relocate to Boston. | |
| MemSQL Stealth Development and In-Memory Architecture | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | An audience member asks about MemSQL's stealth period, prompting Eric to explain the technical necessity of building an in-memory database from scratch. The host acts purely as a facilitator passing the microphone. | |
| Open Source vs. Proprietary Database Models | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Matt prompts a debate on open-source versus proprietary models and interjects to note that complex database software is frequently open-sourced. Eric argues open source is a great marketing tool but a poor business model. | |
| Database Paradigms: NoSQL vs. NewSQL | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | Matt questions whether NoSQL and NewSQL vendors compete directly and asks about enterprise cloud adoption across industry verticals. The guests explain how relational models are evolving past NoSQL key-value limitations. | |
| Audience Q&A: Security Policies and Unstructured Data | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Audience members inquire about enterprise security standards and unstructured data capabilities. Oren explains how fine-grained security policies can be embedded directly into database keys. | |
| Audience Q&A: Data Locality and Enterprise Compliance | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Audience questions focus on memory locality and enterprise compliance. Oren uses a colorful analogy comparing specialized extreme performance tools to a Formula One car versus ten thousand versatile Kias. | |
| Audience Q&A: Shared-Nothing Architecture and SQL vs. MongoDB | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | Audience members challenge panelists on shared-nothing architectures, data marketplace value, and SQL versus MongoDB relevance. Eric details MongoDB's performance constraints, including its global write lock. | |
| Audience Q&A: Data Obsolescence and Multi-Database Architectures | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | An audience member asks about handling data obsolescence over time. Drew outlines how enterprise platforms tier data storage dynamically based on time horizons. | |
| Audience Q&A: Network Inventions and Ethics in Big Data | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | An audience member proposes an unfocused question about a nation-scale GPS invention, prompting Matt to firmly step in and redirect the discussion offline. Drew then shares thoughts on big data ethics and privacy. |