Dec 19, 2013 · 42m · mad
Fred Wilson, USV // Data Driven NYC #18 // Sep 2013 (interviewed by Matt Turck)
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
In this Data Driven NYC event hosted by Matt Turck, venture capitalist Fred Wilson of Union Square Ventures discusses USV's investment thesis on proprietary data assets, network effects, machine learning, and emerging opportunities in healthcare and decentralized finance.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Matt holds 15.8% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Matt, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Fred shuts down an audience member's question about defense industry opportunities by explicitly refusing to back government spying, placing it alongside gambling and pornography.
Hardest push from Matt ▶ 11:01 Bloomberg counterexample challengeMatt directly challenges Fred's premise that businesses require proprietary data assets by pointing out Bloomberg's multi-billion dollar success aggregating third-party data.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 11:21 Reframing Bloomberg's true moatFred re-educates the host on Bloomberg's business model, explaining that its actual defensibility stems from native messaging and transactional network effects rather than data aggregation.
Matt holds his own ▶ 11:01 Matt presses Fred on data ownership thesisMatt demonstrates sharp sector domain knowledge by raising Bloomberg as a prominent counterexample to Fred's thesis on external data aggregation.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Matt as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Matt pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USV Thesis: Proprietary Data Assets and Network Effects | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Matt sets up the discussion by referencing historical USV blog posts on proprietary data assets and asking how USV's focus evolved toward network effects. Fred explains how software alone offers no defensibility and uses an illustrative hypothetical story to highlight how native data assets create moat. | |
| Building Data Networks and the Edmodo Example | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | Matt probes Fred on whether open source communities constitute data networks. Fred candidly admits he lacks a bulletproof argument for open source data networks before detailing how portfolio company Edmodo built free network effects among teachers. | |
| Data Aggregation vs. Internal Messaging Networks | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | Matt directly challenges Fred's thesis by citing Bloomberg as a massive business built on aggregating external data rather than owning proprietary sources. Fred counters by clarifying that Bloomberg's true moat is internal messaging and transactional communications native to the terminal. | |
| Machine Learning Inflection and Twitter's Data Ecosystem | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Matt asks about machine learning inflection points and highlights Twitter's role in open-sourcing infrastructure and providing data firehoses. Fred articulates three core architectural differences distinguishing Twitter from Facebook. | |
| Big Data in Healthcare and DIY Data Science | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | Matt references Fred's post on DIY data science and asks about USV's thesis on healthcare big data. Fred outlines USV's multi-year research approach and reflects on the absence of a central hub like GitHub for casual data hackers. | |
| New York's Data Science Advantages and Team Dynamics | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | Matt highlights New York's institutional university investments in data science and asks about early-stage startup team composition. Fred links NY's data roots back to 1980s Wall Street quants and advises that early consumer startups need great product builders over dedicated data scientists. | |
| Audience Q&A: Government Defense and Developer Infrastructure | 2 | 5 | 6 | 2 | During audience questions, Fred emphatically rejects defense and government surveillance investments, putting spying alongside porn and gambling as excluded categories. He also clarifies USV's focus on developer platforms rather than raw infrastructure tools. | |
| Audience Q&A: Evaluating Early Growth and Marketplace Networks | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | Audience members ask about growth metrics and marketplace dynamics like Lending Club. Fred delivers a detailed analysis on why marketplace networks must grow organically from grassroots users before institutional capital enters. | |
| Audience Q&A: Healthcare Opportunities, Bitcoin, and Transparency | 1 | 7 | 5 | 0 | Fred delivers an impassioned pitch on Bitcoin as the native programmable payments layer for the internet, while forcefully advocating radical data transparency in healthcare and criticizing governmental surveillance double standards. |