Mar 23, 2023 · 20m · mad
The 2023 MAD (Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence & Data) Landscape
gold bands on the timeline = statements, start to end. Hover to read, click to jump. CC turns on captions
Presented by FirstMark partners Matt Turck and Kevin Zhang, the 2023 MAD (Machine Learning, AI & Data) Landscape presentation analyzes key industry trends, contrasting market consolidation and macroeconomic pressures in data infrastructure against the explosive growth and geopolitical tensions surrounding Generative AI.
How this conversation actually went
Every chapter scored 0–10 on four independent dynamics. Hover any point for the reasoning behind the score. Matt holds 77.6% of the talking time here. How this is scored →
speaking balance: gold is Matt, purple is the guest (3 minute bins)
Kevin lightheartedly frames himself as the bad cop presenting severe public market drawdowns and funding contractions, serving as the most contrasting framing in a entirely collaborative presentation.
Hardest push from Matt ▶ 4:14 Reframing persistent market consolidation assumptionsMatt directly challenges the repeated annual assumption that market consolidation must immediately occur, explaining why VCs and founders resisted selling despite overcrowded categories.
Biggest teaching moment ▶ 18:40 Detailed update on Chinese GPU developmentsKevin educates the audience on Chinese domestic GPU maker MoreThreads raising capital to counter US semiconductor sanctions despite current driver and performance lags.
Matt holds his own ▶ 13:40 Technical taxonomy of transformer originsMatt demonstrates deep domain knowledge by detailing how the foundational transformer architecture originated in research at Google before being commercialized by OpenAI and Microsoft.
the scores for every segment, with the reasoning behind each
| Chapter | Topic | Matt as informed peer | Guest teaching | Guest disagreement | Matt pushing back | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landscape Evolution: 2012 vs. 2023 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Matt opens the presentation with historical context on the MAD landscape growth from 139 to 1416 companies. Kevin co-presents macro financial data regarding tech drawdowns and venture slowdowns in a completely collaborative tone. | |
| Trend 2: Bundling & Market Consolidation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Host monologue by Matt detailing market consolidation trends, ARR valuation challenges, and overcrowding in data quality and MLOps categories. Per instructions for monologue segments, host-side metrics are set to 0. | |
| Trend 3: Modern Data Stack Under Pressure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Host monologue by Matt presenting pressures on the Modern Data Stack, architectural alternatives like DuckDB and Trino, and convergence of batch and real-time processing. Host-side metrics scored 0 for monologue format. | |
| Trend 5: Generative AI Goes Mainstream & Multimodal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Host monologue by Matt highlighting Generative AI mainstream adoption, ChatGPT bar exam benchmarks, and multimodal tools including a demo of his own Synthesia avatar. Monologue segment scores zeroed out. | |
| Trends 6 & 7: GenAI Boom & Political Economy of AI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Host monologue by Matt explaining the political economy of AI, tracing transformer origins from Google to OpenAI and noting the shift of R&D from academia to industry. Monologue segment scores zeroed out. | |
| Trend 8: Opportunities in GenAI SaaS & LLMOps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Host monologue by Matt discussing application layer dynamics (e.g. Jasper), workflow defensibility, and emerging infrastructure like LLMOps and vector databases. Monologue segment scores zeroed out. | |
| Trend 9: AI Ethics, Safety & Regulatory Backlash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Guest/co-speaker monologue by Kevin discussing AI regulation (EU AI Act), copyright issues, and US-China semiconductor geopolitics including domestic Chinese GPU development. Monologue format yields low interaction scores. | |
| Conclusion and Contact Information | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Concluding housekeeping segment by Matt providing contact information and closing remarks. Standard low scoring for administrative closing. |