Adapting to company context predicts if an executive lasts over a year
Will Larson · A masterclass in engineering leadership from Carta, Stripe, and Uber | Will Larson (CTO at Carta) · Nov 16, 2023 · at 45:24
Will Larson, CTO at Carta, discusses executive onboarding anti-patterns and why incoming leaders fail.
0:00 / 0:14exact quote · 14.4s
▶ Watch the full episode on YouTube → 720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“And this is like one of the, to me, most predictive traits for whether an executive will last more than a year at a company. It's where they come in and they start with, Hey, can I, how can I change myself to fit versus how can I force my entire organization to fit to work with me?”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading: filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard (the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Will Larson
Tech companies dodged engineering resource allocation for a decade through overhiring
“One challenge of the last decade, right, is that resource allocation was largely dodged by many companies because they just Decided to spend more and hire more folks. And so oftentimes the real constraint was, like, hiring velocity on a given team and your abi…”
Believing engineering managers shouldn't get into technical details is an anti-pattern
“I think one of the lessons in management over the last decade has been that You know, managers are people leaders in that it is micromanagement that it is bad to get into the details. I think this is like an anti pattern because it creates disengaged and like …”
Larson: Engineering executives must educate peers instead of shielding teams
“The most valuable thing as an executive you can do is educate like the other execs on how engineering works, not kind of protecting engineering from visibility from anyone else.”
CTOs and chief architects lack context for centralized technical decisions
“Chief architects and CTOs are pretty inefficient in terms of Actually getting enough context in their heads to make a good decision on any given, given point.”
Larson: Architecture review committees rarely make the best technical decisions
“And then committees, like in almost every architecture group turns into a committee where they have to balance their different perspectives, or they're just like slow and kind of inelegant. It's rarely true that a committee gets the best decision.”