why aren't all 7 resolved? a statement only gets an assessment when the public
record can support or contradict it. opinions and what-ifs never can, and 0 checkable
ones are still open, waiting for their date. predictions held up or didn't;
assertions are supported or contradicted. on every card:
▮▮▮▮▮ certainty ·
▮▮▮▮▮ debate potential. speakers are clickable
Assertion Supported
Hoka reached $1.4B in annual sales, up from $153M in 2018
“This past year, Hoka did 1.4 billion dollars in sales. That is up from three million dollars in sales, as I mentioned, just 10 years ago, and a hundred fifty three million dollars in sales just five years ago.”
Assertion Supported
Deckers acquired Hoka for a reported $1M in 2012
“In 2012, the oversized sneaker brand Hoka was doing around three million dollars in revenue, and it was bought by Deckers, the owner of Ugg and Teva and a few other brands, and Deckers bought Hoka for a reported million dollars.”
Assertion Partly supported
Hoka failed a Dick's Sporting Goods test in 2014, returning in 2020
“In 2014, Hoka tested a small number of stores and they didn't see enough consumer demand, so they pulled the shoes from Dick's shelves very quickly. They'd only returned two Dick's in 2020 when the brand was multiples of its 20 14 size and they had enough dema…”
Assertion Supported
Hoka became triathletes' most-worn shoe brand starting in 2017
“After ultra marathoners came triathletes which Hoka became the most worn shoe ahead of Asics, Nike, and Saucony beginning in 2017.”
Assertion Supported
Hoka grew from under 10% to nearly 40% of Deckers' total revenue
“In 2018, when Hoka did a hundred fifty three million in revenue, the brand was responsible for less than 10% of Decker's revenues. Now, it accounts for nearly 40%.”
Opinion
American elites increasingly view ugly footwear like Yeezys as high fashion
“Where it feels like the uglier the apparel or the footwear, the more fashionable it's considered by America's elite. You don't have to look any further than Yeezy foam runners, which are possibly the world's ugliest shoes.”
Assertion Supported
Hoka launched at $160, pricing $20-$30 above typical 2009 running shoes
“On top of that, the shoes at launch were 160 dollars, which was 20 to 30 dollars more than typical running shoes in 2009.”