Tech analyst Benedict Evans debates whether generative AI like OpenAI's DALL-E produces real art, comparing prompt-based generation to photography.
0:00 / 0:44exact quote · 44.1s
720p mp4 · rendered on demand · StarZero watermark
“It's like, you know, if I take a photograph, is the camera now the artist and not me? Well, no, it's me that decided what the picture was, and where to point it, and how to take it, and which of the 2000 pictures you took is, is the one. And, you know, I was talking about this on Twitter with somebody today, and I posted the kind of classic Cartier-Bresson picture of the guy kind of jumping over a puddle outside the Gare du Nord. And I think the story is, you know, he literally stuck his camera against a hole in a fence and clicked the button and looked at the contact sheet later and saw the image. But you wouldn't say like that's a random image or that, you know, the camera took the image. It's he looked and saw and chose. And the same thing with Dali. It's humans that are putting prompts in and it's humans that are choosing which are the ones that are good or interesting.”
quote is from the automated transcript, cleaned for reading:
filler sounds and stutters are removed, nothing is rephrased. names can be misheard
(the analysis reads context, assessments check outside sources). how →
More from Benedict Evans
Opinion
Evans: Creators most upset about AI art lack originality
“The really unkind thing one could say is that the people who are most upset about AI art are the people who are making stuff that has no particular authenticity originality. I mean, if you, if you've made, if you wrote 10 vampire romance books last year and yo…”
Evans: Skeptics dismissing AI as useless or like NFTs are ignoring reality
“The real idiots are the people who are just saying, oh, none of this works, and it's all nonsense, and it's just a stochastic parrot, and it's useless, and I don't know what it's for and this is all, like, nonsense, and this is a rerun of NFTs. Because these p…”
The DOJ gerrymandered its market definition in the Apple antitrust lawsuit
“The DOJ is suing Apple for having what the DOJ, claiming the DOJ describes as a monopoly of, quote, performance smartphones, which Apple described as gerrymandering, and I'm kind of inclined to agree”
Benedict EvansAug 19, 2024▶ 20:48Google's Antitrust case
Opinion
The Microsoft antitrust case did not create Google or the iPhone
“This is kind of bizarre assertions that somehow the DHA Microsoft case resulted in the rise of Google or resulted in the iPod and the iPhone, which is just ignorant nonsense.”
Benedict EvansAug 19, 2024▶ 32:45Google's Antitrust case
Opinion
Evans: Rabbit's 'cack-handed' AI hardware is becoming a 'smoking hole'
“And we saw this kind of completely cack-handed attempt at doing this from Rabbit, which is now well on the way to being a smoking hole in the ground.”
This entire site, over 100 episodes transcribed, diarized, checked and made playable,
runs on the StarZero media pipeline. Drop in your own episode and the podcast clipper finds the
moments worth sharing, cuts them, captions them, and reframes them for every feed.
We use essential cookies to make the site work. With your permission we
also use analytics cookies (Google Analytics and Mixpanel) to understand
usage and improve StarZero. See our Cookie Policy.